Hollitscher never ever showed a disagreement who head, step-by-step, regarding positivism so you can reality and he could have regarded as the latest try to make such as for example an argument since the philosophical folly. He alternatively created the realist standing by itself, portrayed they by advice out-of science and you can commonsense, displayed just how closely it had been associated with medical look and you will everyday action and therefore shown its fuel. (SFS, p. 113).

3.2 Very early Experience of Wittgenstein (1948–1952)

Feyerabend’s dominant intellectual engagement about late 1940s and you can very early 1950s was a student in his capabilities as student frontrunner of “Kraft Community”. Viktor Kraft are an old person in the fresh Vienna Community, and turned into Feyerabend’s dissertation management. New Kraft Community try a philosophy club centred to Kraft, hence constituted various other a portion of the Austrian College or university People. Bela Juhos, Walter Hollitscher, Georg Henrik von Wright, E Anscombe and you may Wittgenstein had been every visiting sound system. Feyerabend account your Community held conferences out of 1949 to help you 1952 otherwise 1953 (SFS, p. 109), which they put on their own the work away from “considering philosophical problems within the a great nonmetaphysical manner in accordance with special reference for the results of sciences” (“Herbert Feigl: A beneficial Biographical Sketch”, in P. K.Feyerabend & Grams.Maxwell (eds.), Head, Count, and you will Means: Essays inside the Beliefs and you can Science in honor of Herbert Feigl, (Minneapolis: University away from Minnesota Force, 1966), pp. 1–2) and therefore the fundamental subjects out of conversation have been all the questions out of reality away from theoretic agencies as well as the new “exterior world”. Throughout the Wittgenstein’s lecture, Feyerabend recalls the next:

Not really a quick and you will very interesting head to of the Wittgenstein himself (within the 1952) you certainly will advance our very own discussion. Wittgenstein was spectacular in the way of to present concrete circumstances, such as for instance amoebas not as much as a great microscope… however when he kept we nevertheless did not know if otherwise perhaps not there clearly was an outward world, otherwise, when the there can be one to, what the arguments was in preference of it. (Feyerabend & Maxwell ibid., p. 4. Keep in mind that Feyerabend should have had the latest day wrong, once the Wittgenstein passed away within the April 1951).

Feyerabend at some point install these thoughts during the an interesting variety of documents originating in 1957, arguing you to science demands realism in order to improvements, and this positivism do stultify instance progress

Wittgenstein, which took lengthy and then make upwards his attention and you may up coming checked more an hour late offered an effective saturated show and you will appeared to prefer our disrespectful feelings into fawning appreciate the guy came across sugar-daddies in other places. (SFS, p. 109).

In 1949, Feyerabend is brought so you’re able to Bertolt Brecht, and you will Hollitscher offered him the opportunity to be one of Brecht’s development personnel, however, the guy turned it off, later on discussing that it as among the greatest errors of his existence (SFS, p. 114). Regarding the autobiography, yet not, the guy folds this report, saying that however n’t have appreciated becoming an element of the closely knit classification that surrounded Brecht. (The causes to possess his afterwards defection in the Popperian camp check to own already been comparable).

The College of Vienna’s physicists were Hans Thirring, Karl Przibram, and you can Felix Ehrenhaft. Feyerabend admired Thirring and Ehrenhaft, and is actually determined by Ehrenhaft, that has lectured toward physics indeed there out-of 1947. Ehrenhaft are labeled as a brutal and you can separate critic of all kinds of orthodoxy inside the physics, however, are often regarded as a charlatan. Feyerabend reports he along with his other research youngsters checked pass so you can presenting him since a fraud, however in reality was treated, within 1949 Alpbach summit, so you can a fight ranging from Ehrenhaft therefore the orthodox where the previous presented their experiments nevertheless the second defended the condition because of the playing with procedures and this Galileo’s opponents would-have-been happy with, ridiculing Ehrenhaft’s phenomena just like the simple Dreckeffects. Feyerabend commented one to “Just far afterwards performed Ehrenhaft’s tutorial sink when you look at the and you can our very own thinking at that time plus the thinking of your own entire community provided me then which have an excellent instance of the sort out of medical rationality” (SFS, p. 111). Ehrenhaft failed to convince brand new theoreticians, whom secure themselves which have an iron curtain from dogmatic trust regarding the same type while the you to implemented by Galileo’s rivals. His audience stayed staunch empiricists, never doubt one technology had to be adjusted so you can products. Feyerabend said that time-to-go out company out of research, what Thomas Kuhn entitled “regular research”, don’t can be found versus this “separated awareness”.